Miljøhensyn gjør BMW mindre ekstrem

[Rikerud]

For den som gidder ;D

A basic look at how climate scientists infer that man-made carbon gases are changing the climate, and how this view is contradicted by other climate scientists who are skeptics. I am a former science correspondent with an interest in reporting the facts, not the media hype. My thanks to 9thgate for checking my script for errors.

This video, the second in the series, looks at alternative hypotheses explaining global warming. I am only looking at alternative hypotheses put forward by real, professional climate researchers, and the findings of real, professional climate researchers who disagree with them. Yes, I've left a lot of the detail out. This is a 10-minute video summarizing the arguments and counter-arguments, not a PhD thesis. The comments forum will be free and open, as always, but if you disagree with what real, professional climate scientists say, please take it up with them and dont expect me to defend their point of view. If you have a stunning piece of scientific evidence that disproves one side or the other, dont waste time on my channel, write a paper, and get it peer-reviewed and published in a reputable journal.

I had planned to put several myths in this video, but discovered such an appalling web of deceit and fabrication in this first one that I felt I had no choice but to thoroughly debunk it. Like many ingrained myths, this one is so ubiquitous that it takes an awful lot of hard evidence to convince true believers that it's been fabricated.

This video, the fourth in my Climate Change series, looks at urban myths spawned by two iconic films -- An Inconvenient Truth and The Great Global Warming Swindle. Whatever you "believe" about climate change, there is no excuse for the kind of exaggerations, fallacies and fabrications we see in films like these. My aim is to cut through the junk science designed to evangelize this issue, and show what the actual scientific research shows us. The video cuts short at the end, and the final sentence should read: "As I look at more of the urban myths theyve spawned."

More urban myths about climate change are busted as I look at the Earth's climate over the last 500 million years. What causes it to change? Since carbon dioxide was much higher in the past, why do climatologists say higher CO2 now poses a problem? And of course there's the familiar myth that CO2 can't influence temperatures because the climate was much colder in the past when carbon dioxide levels were much higher.

[Fredrik 90]

Dritlei miljøhysteriet

+1,

+2

+3

+4 Klimahysteriet ødelegger for all annen fokus på miljø.

+5

+6

Det finnes ikke noe som har med miljø å gjøre som er positivt synes jeg

[Rikerud]

Ja det er mye klimahysteri. Alt for mye. Men det er noen av sakene som tas opp som er reelle og de fortjener å bli tatt alvorlig. Både for oss selv og våre barn sin del.

[Hauso]

Dritlei miljøhysteriet

+1,

+2

+3

+4 Klimahysteriet ødelegger for all annen fokus på miljø.

+5

+6

Det finnes ikke noe som har med miljø å gjøre som er positivt synes jeg

+7...

[AuroraDriver]

Dritlei miljøhysteriet

+1,

+2

+3

+4 Klimahysteriet ødelegger for all annen fokus på miljø.

+5

+6

Det finnes ikke noe som har med miljø å gjøre som er positivt synes jeg

+7...

+ 8

Jeg holder en knapp på avskoging (ingen skog, ingenting å holde tilbake regn og jord), forurensing og overbefolkning. Regninga for CO2 utslipp, er ingenting annet enn avlat.